Gateway 7.3
Product Team AProduct Team A
Patch appliedPatch applied
Remediation validatedRemediation validated
Next action
Approve closureApprove closure
Vulnerability closure across organisations
Veedor’s agents map impact, collect and reconcile evidence from suppliers, integrators and internal teams, and activate follow-ups and escalations. Your team approves impact, remediation and closure.
Veedor fits when a vulnerability spans multiple releases, multiple owners and at least one external organisation.
One case in Veedor
Gateway 7.3
Product Team AProduct Team A
Patch appliedPatch applied
Remediation validatedRemediation validated
Next action
Approve closureApprove closure
Edge 4.8
Product Team B + Supplier AProduct Team B + Supplier A
Supplier: Not affectedSupplier A: Not affected
Vulnerable path presentInternal evidence: Vulnerable path present
Next action
Request justificationRequest technical justification
Due in 48h
Follow-up 2 sent
Control 2.1
Program Team C + Integrator BProgram Team C + Integrator B
Presence unconfirmedComponent presence unconfirmed
Owner not assignedOwner not assigned
Next action
Confirm owner and scopeAssign owner and confirm scope
Owner request sent
The closure gap
The case stays open while evidence is scattered, answers lack justification or no one owns the next action. Each product, application and release may belong to a different team and remediation cycle. Each one needs an evidence-backed conclusion.
SBOMs, tickets, email, tests and advisories each contain a different part of the evidence.
A “not affected” answer without versions, reasoning or proof cannot close a case.
Every claim must be mapped to the specific products, applications, configurations and releases you ship or support.
How Veedor automates
They map impact, reconcile evidence and activate the actions required. Your team retains authority over impact, remediation and closure.
Links the vulnerable component to every product, application, configuration and release.
Compares sources and detects gaps, contradictions or unsupported conclusions.
Routes by release and escalates blocked responses, patches or validations.
Assembles evidence, exceptions, decisions and approvals in a traceable dossier.
Every automated action is recorded and constrained by approved permissions and rules.
Start with a real case
Closure evidence audit
€2,500
Fixed price
Stress-test the evidence and conclusion of a case your team has already closed.
Larger cases are quoted separately.
Active case pilot
From €7,500
One-time payment · scope-based
Run one active vulnerability case while Veedor drives evidence requests, approvals, follow-ups and escalations and your team retains decision authority.
50% of the audit or pilot fee is credited toward the first annual plan.
Plans start at €15,000/year and include unlimited internal users, unlicensed external participants and an annual case volume defined in the proposal. Pricing adjusts to the product and application portfolio and the complexity of the third-party network.
External participants respond through a secure link or email and do not need a Veedor licence.
Prices exclude VAT.
Before you start
No. Veedor starts after a potential vulnerability is identified and coordinates the evidence required to determine product impact, validate the response and close the case.
No. A closure evidence audit can start with existing files, exports, email, SBOMs and records. Integrations are added only when they provide value.
No. Your organisation contracts Veedor. External participants can respond through secure links or agreed channels without buying a licence.
No. Engineering and validation teams perform technical remediation and testing. Veedor links their results to affected products, evidence and approvals.
Veedor can map relationships, extract claims, detect gaps, draft and send requests within approved rules, and run follow-ups and escalations. An authorised person approves impact, remediation, risk acceptance and closure.
No. It prepares case evidence and tracks reporting deadlines. It does not replace conformity assessment, legal advice or your organisation’s reporting decision.
Not in the initial SaaS offering. The data scope is agreed before each pilot. Any private or on-premises deployment would require a separate security and product assessment.
Veedor