Scattered evidence
SBOMs, tickets, email, tests and advisories each tell a different part of the story.
Product vulnerability closure for manufacturers
Veedor is a product vulnerability closure platform that collects supplier and internal evidence, maps every claim to the relevant product versions, exposes gaps and records human-approved conclusions.
For product security, engineering, quality and compliance teams.
CVE-2026-1482
Communication library · high severity
The closure gap
The case stays open until every product version has an evidence-backed status and every affected version has a validated response.
SBOMs, tickets, email, tests and advisories each tell a different part of the story.
A “not affected” answer without versions, reasoning or proof cannot close a case.
One supplier response must be mapped to every configuration you sell or support.
How it works
One case connects the component alert, supplier claims, affected configurations, technical validation and named approvals.
Connect the vulnerability to the components, products and versions that may be affected.
Request structured answers from suppliers and bring in existing emails, SBOMs, tickets and test records.
Veedor links every claim to its source and surfaces missing evidence, contradictions and unanswered questions.
Your team records the remedy or exception, attaches validation evidence and approves closure.
Secure supplier links · email · files · SBOMs · ticket exports · validation records
Controlled decisions
Veedor proposes claims, gaps and follow-up questions. Authorised owners approve product impact, validation and closure.
Every claim retains its source, original language, product context and review status.
Missing evidence and contradictions remain visible until a named owner decides.
Product impact, supplier evidence, remedies, validations, exceptions and approvals are assembled into one defensible export.
Where Veedor fits
For manufacturers of connected, software-enabled and dual-use products with third-party components and long support lifecycles.
Coordinate upstream vulnerabilities across embedded components, product families, suppliers and supported versions.
Preserve the evidence, deadlines and approvals behind 24-hour, 72-hour and final reporting. Your organisation makes the determination and submits.
Explore CRA reportingLink supplier claims to controlled configurations, validation evidence and technical approvals across long-lived product programmes.
Initial SaaS pilots are limited to unclassified information.
Start with a real case
Replay a closed case or run one bounded active case before committing to an annual plan.
Historical case replay
€2,500 fixed
Test Veedor on a case your team has already closed.
Larger cases are quoted separately.
Active case pilot
From €7,500
Run one active vulnerability case through Veedor while your team retains every approval.
50% of the replay or pilot fee is credited toward the first annual plan.
Annual plans start at €15,000 and scale with case volume, product portfolio and supplier complexity—not seats.
Prices exclude VAT.
Before you start
No. Veedor starts after a potential vulnerability is identified and coordinates the evidence required to determine product impact, validate the response and close the case.
No. Engineering and validation teams perform technical remediation and testing. Veedor links their results to affected products, evidence and approvals.
No. It can propose a claim and cite evidence; an authorised person must approve it.
No. It prepares case evidence and tracks reporting deadlines. It does not replace conformity assessment, legal advice or your organisation’s reporting decision.
No. Initial SaaS pilots are limited to unclassified information, including unclassified dual-use cases. Private or on-premises deployment is not included and would require a separate security and product assessment.
Veedor